Saturday, March 28, 2009

Prison Bust

Something shocking just happened in Ohio.

Prosecutors there said they want to reduce sentences for criminals — not hardened murderers, just non-violent and low-level drug offenders.

Prosecutors — not prison reform advocates or defense attorneys — said they want to eliminate mandatory prison sentences for trafficking and possession of chemicals for the manufacture of drugs, except in the most serious cases. They also want to reduce several other non-drug crimes to misdemeanors from felonies, including assaulting a school teacher without physical harm; injuring a police dog or horse; illegal use of food stamps; and stealing cable television

The biggest change, however, would be to give judges more flexibility in sending second-time offenders to drug treatment programs instead of jail.

It says a lot when prosecutors request less time for criminals, and Ohio isn’t the only state where this is happening.

In California, home to the largest prison system in the country, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger , a Republican, plans to cut his prison costs by reducing the number of people on parole. (Most of the people entering California prisons go, not for committing new crimes, but for violating technicalities of their parole. The Governater basically wants to release certain ex-cons without the benefit of state supervision).

California’s prison system is so overcrowded that the courts recently ruled that the state has to release 57,000 prisoners. And conditions so poor that a judge recently found Schwarzenegger in contempt of court for defying his order to pay the first $250 million of a multibillion-dollar plan to rebuild the state prison health care system.

Last year Schwarzenegger wanted $6.7 billion to build new prisons. Pending double-digit budget deficits probably was enough to change his mind.

Washington Governor Christine Gregoire , D, is proposing the release of low-risk female inmates whose children are in foster care. The move is expected to help close a $9 billion budget shortfall.

Read the rest here.

Thursday, March 26, 2009

Remembering John Hope Franklin

John Hope Franklin, Scholar Who Transformed African-American History, Dies at 94

John Hope Franklin, the scholar who helped create the field of African-American history and dominated it for nearly six decades, has died at the age of 94.

Franklin died of congestive heart failure at Duke Hospital this morning. He is survived by his son, John Whittington Franklin, daughter-in-law Karen Roberts Franklin, sister-in-law Bertha W. Gibbs, cousin Grant Franklin Sr., a host of nieces, nephews, great-nieces and great-nephews, other family members, many generations of students and friends. There will be a celebration of his life and of his late wife Aurelia Franklin at 11 a.m. June 11 in Duke Chapel in honor of their 69th wedding anniversary.

[In lieu of flowers, the family has asked that contributions be made to the Aurelia W. and John Hope Franklin Endowed Scholarship Fund at Fisk University, c/o Office of Institutional Advancement, 1000 17th Street North, Nashville, TN 37208.]

“John Hope Franklin lived for nearly a century and helped define that century,” said Duke President Richard H. Brodhead. “A towering historian, he led the recognition that African-American history and American history are one. With his grasp of the past, he spent a lifetime building a future of inclusiveness, fairness and equality. Duke has lost a great citizen and a great friend.”

Franklin, James B. Duke Professor Emeritus of History, was a scholar who brought intellectual rigor as well an engaged passion to his work. He wrote about history – one of his books is considered a core text on the African-American experience, more than 60 years after its publication – and he lived it. Franklin worked on the Brown v. Board of Education (1954) case, joined protestors in a 1965 march led by Martin Luther King, Jr. in Montgomery, Ala. and headed President Clinton’s 1997 national advisory board on race.

He is perhaps best known to the public for his work on President Clinton’s 1997 task force on race. But his reputation as a scholar was made in 1947 with the publication of his book, “From Slavery to Freedom: A History of African-Americans,” which is still considered the definitive account of the black experience in America.

“My challenge was to weave into the fabric of American history enough of the presence of blacks so that the story of the United States could be told adequately and fairly,” he said when the 50th anniversary of the book was celebrated in 1997. “That was terribly important.”

In January 2005, he spoke at Duke at the celebration of his 90th birthday, displaying the fire that motivated him throughout his long life. While others at the event talked about the past and reminisced about his accomplishments, Franklin focused squarely on the future. He described the event, held the same day as President George W. Bush’s second inauguration, as a “counter-inaugural,” and gave a talk in the form of a letter to a fictional white man he called “Jonathan Doe.”

He recounted some of the historical inequalities in the United States and recalled some of his own experiences with racism. He said, for example, that the evening before he received the Presidential Medal of Freedom from President Bill Clinton, a woman at his club in Washington, D.C., asked him to get her coat. Around the same time, a man at a hotel handed Franklin his car keys and told him to get his car.

“I patiently explained to him that I was a guest in the hotel, as I presumed he was, and I had no idea where his automobile was. And, in any case, I was retired,” Franklin said. Both of these incidents occurred when he was in his 80s.

“What these experiences will do to me in the long run, I do not know. My cardiologist says that they are not good,” he said, continuing with the letter.

“I very much doubt, Mr. Doe, that you have had such experiences. Your race and your consequent position of power and privilege have doubtless immunized you from the experiences that a black person confronts daily, regardless of his age, education, position or station in life.”

At the time From Slavery to Freedom was published, there were few scholars working in African-American history and the books that had been published were not highly regarded by academics. To write it, he first had to give himself a course in African-American history, then spend months struggling to complete the research in segregated libraries and archives – including Duke’s, where he could not use the bathroom.

Franklin accumulated many honors during his long career, including the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the nation’s highest civilian honor. He shared the John W. Kluge Award for lifetime achievement in the humanities and a similar honor from the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and the American Philosophical Society, the nation’s two oldest learned societies.

But he also was revered as a “moral leader” of the historical profession for his engagement in the pressing issues of the day, his unflagging advocacy of civil rights, and his gracious and courtly demeanor.

Virtually all of the many articles written about “John Hope,” as he was called by friends and colleagues, include the words “distinguished” or “elegant.” His devotion to his wife, Aurelia, who died in 1999, was legendary, as was his love of orchids, which he raised in his Durham home. He even had one named after him: Phalaenopsis John Hope Franklin.

Franklin recounted the events of his long life in his autobiography “Mirror to America: The Autobiography of John Hope Franklin,” which was published in 2005. To read and hear an interview with Franklin about his book, go to http://www.dukenews.duke.edu/2005/11/jhf_qa.html.

The grandson of a slave, Franklin’s work was informed by his first-hand experience with injustices of racism -- not just in Rentiesville, Okla., the small black community where he was born on Jan. 2, 1915, but throughout his life.

Named after John Hope, the former president of Atlanta University, Franklin was the son of Buck Colbert Franklin, one of the first black lawyers in the Oklahoma Indian territory, and Mollie Parker Franklin, a schoolteacher and community leader.

The realities of racism hit Franklin at an early age. He has said he vividly remembers the humiliating experience of being put off the train with his mother because she refused to move to a segregated compartment for a six-mile trip to the next town. He was 6. Later, although an academic star at Booker T. Washington High School and valedictorian of his class, the state would not allow him to study at the state university because he was black.

So instead of the University of Oklahoma, in 1931 Franklin enrolled at Fisk University, a historically black college in Nashville, Tenn., intending to study law.

However, a white history professor, Theodore Currier, caused him to change his mind and he received his bachelor’s degree in history in 1935. Currier became a close friend and mentor and when Franklin’s money ran out, Currier loaned the young student $500 to attend graduate school at Harvard University, where he received his master’s in 1936 and doctorate five years later.

He began his career as an instructor at Fisk in 1936 and taught at St. Augustine’s and North Carolina College for Negroes (now North Carolina Central University), both historically black colleges.

In 1945, Alfred A. Knopf approached him about writing a book on African-American history – originally titled From Slavery to Freedom: A History of American Negroes -- and he spent 13 months writing it.

Then in 1947, he took a post as professor at Howard University, where, in the early 1950s, he traveled from Washington to Thurgood Marshall’s law office to help prepare the brief that led to the historic Brown v. Board of Education decision.

In 1956 he became chairman of the all-white history department at Brooklyn College. Despite his position, he had to visit 35 real estate agents before he was able to buy a house for his young family and no New York bank would loan him the money.

Later, while at the University of Chicago, he accompanied the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. on the march from Selma to Montgomery, Ala. in 1965.

He spent 16 years at the University of Chicago, coming to Duke in 1982. He retired from the history department in 1985, then spent seven years as professor of legal history at the Duke Law School.

Franklin was a prolific writer, with books including The Emancipation Proclamation, The Militant South, The Free Negro in North Carolina, George Washington Williams: A Biography and A Southern Odyssey: Travelers in the Antebellum North. He also has edited many works, including a book about his father called My Life and an Era: The Autobiography of Buck Colbert Franklin, with his son, John Whittington Franklin. Franklin completed his autobiography in 2005, which was reviewed favorably in many media outlets across the country.

He received more than 130 honorary degrees, and served as president of the Phi Beta Kappa Society, the American Studies Association, the Southern Historical Association, the Organization of American Historians and the American Historical Association.

Franklin’s best-known accomplishment in his later years was in 1997, when he was appointed chairman of the advisory board for President Clinton’s One America: The President’s Initiative on Race. The seven-member panel was charged with directing a national conversation on race relations.

When he was named to the post, Franklin remarked, “I am not sure this is an honor. It may be a burden.”

The panel did provoke criticism, both from conservatives who pressured the panel to hear from opponents of racial preference and others who said it did not make enough progress. Franklin himself acknowledged in an interview with USA Today in 1997 that the group could not solve the nation’s racial problems.

But Franklin said the effort was still worth it.

In 2007, lent his formidable effort to the issue of reparations for African Americans. Franklin returned to Oklahoma to testify in a hearing urging Congress to pass legislation that would clear the way for survivors of the Tulsa Race Riots of 1921, one of the nation's worst race riots, to sue for reparations.

At Duke, Franklin’s legacy has been honored in many ways. In 2006 he delivered Duke’s commencement address. After celebrating his 90th birthday in January 2005, Duke held a symposium celebrating the 10th anniversary of the John Hope Franklin Collection of African & African American Documentation in the Rare Book, Manuscript, and Special Collections Library at Duke University. The event also marked the publication of his autobiography. A portrait of Franklin was hung in Perkins Library in 1997.

And, in 2001, Duke opened the John Hope Franklin Center for Interdisciplinary and International Studies, (jhfc.duke.edu) where scholars, artists and members of the community have the opportunity to engage in public discourse on a variety of issues, including race, social equity and globalization. At the heart of its mission is the Franklin Humanities Institute, which sponsors public events and hosts the Franklin Seminar, a residential fellowship program for Duke faculty and graduate students.

For Franklin, who continued his scholarly work and public appearances full-bore into his 90s, the work he began in the 1940s still was not finished.

In a statement to the American Academy of Arts and Letters in 2002, Franklin summed up his own career: “More than 60 years ago, I began the task of trying to write a new kind of Southern History. It would be broad in its reach, tolerant in its judgments of Southerners, and comprehensive in its inclusion of everyone who lived in the region. ... the long, tragic history of the continuing black-white conflict compelled me to focus on the struggle that has affected the lives of the vast majority of people in the United States. ... Looking back, I can plead guilty of having provided only a sketch of the work I laid out for myself.”

A special website commemorates the life and legacy of historian John Hope Franklin. Leave condolences at: http://www.duke.edu/johnhopefranklin.

Join the Facebook group "In Memory of John Hope Franklin (1915-2009)" here: tinyurl.com/c7v6m8.

Wednesday, March 25, 2009

Did Steve Harvey Plagiarize Best Seller?

There is a rumor going around that Steve Harvey and his co-writer might have stolen the idea for his new, best-selling book, Act Like a Lady, Think Like a Man.

Full disclosure: I haven't read the book yet, but I have been eyeing it in my local Border's bookstore. It currently sits atop the New York Times Best Selling book list and several book clubs are now reading it.

The book dishes advice to women, who Harvey says, are setting their standards too low when it comes to men. He even went on Oprah to promote it recently.

Man, if this rumor is true, it will be the second time Oprah has gotten burned by an unethical writer (or co-writer in this case).

Oprah's gonna be pissed.

Anyway, Sharon P. Carson published an e-book by the same name in 2003, according to this web site.

The book sells online for $7.99 (not the $23.99 price-sticker on Harvey's book). In it, Carson touts her book as providing "keys to self-worth and surviving a love knockout."

There's more on Carson's book below. Meanwhile, let me know if this comes up on Steve Harvey's radio show.

Taken from Sharon P. Carson's Act Like a Lady, Think Like a Man:

Act like a Lady – Think like a Man is a
collection of short lessons that are intended to
inspire women to practice both self-love and
tough love in relationships.

In today’s world women’s hearts are being
broken over and over again, as easily as eggs
for an omelet and without remorse or second
thought.

By gaining some insight into
how men think (in terms of their relationships
with women,) a woman can help better her
present relationship and be more able either to
recognize the signs of a bad relationship so
that she doesn’t fall into one, or to recognize
if she has already fallen into one.

Saturday, March 21, 2009

He's the President, Not A Pop Star

People waited for hours to get tickets.

They arrived at 2 a.m. or earlier. Some had the foresight to bring tents, while others lay in wait on cots or sat in lounge chairs for all that time.

Just a glimpse of him would be more than some could ever wish for. Alas, more than a thousand people were turned away after learning there were no more tickets.

Forget Michael Jackson and his sold-out concert in London. I’m referring to President Obama’s town hall meeting in Costa Mesa, California.

The point of the town hall meeting was to provide an opportunity for Obama to spread his economic message. But it was peppered with American Idol-like adulation and screams of the kind I imagine Elvis Presley must have received.

A couple of times somebody in the crowd yelled, “I love you.” The president responded, “I love you back.”

I cringed.

What’s love got to do with it?

We’re still fighting two wars, have Iran breathing down our necks, an economic crisis of epidemic proportions on our hands, and the people are acting like he’s Paris Hilton, not the president.

Okay, Sen. John McCain , R-Ariz., tried to use that line before and it didn’t work. But some presidential scholars now worry that Obama risks being perceived as not taking his job seriously enough.

“I think there is a danger for Obama in looking too much like a celebrity star. It was an avenue of attack that McCain used against him in the campaign, it didn’t work then, but that was the campaign. It’s different when you’re in office,” says Jeremy Mayer, presidential expert at George Mason University. “I think he risks the stature of the presidency being diminished.”

Obama recognized the attention he was getting from the crowd (I guess you can’t ignore someone yelling, “I love you”) but he also tried to strike a more somber note by steering the audience back to his message about the economy.

There is a certain “coolness” to Obama’s approach that may help make him more appealing to the masses than past presidents. But what happens when you’re too cool, too awesome?

Friday, March 20, 2009

Palin Blasts Obama for Special Olympics Comment

But wait, didn't Governor Sarah Palin just, this week, turn down federal stimulus money that would have helped special needs education programs?

Give me a friggin break! This woman never ceases to make me laugh.

Story is here.

Thursday, March 19, 2009

Too Bad Mel Brooks Can't Write Ending to AIG Mess

It defies logic that executives of American International Group Inc. who are responsible for running the company into the ground would get $165 million in bonuses.

And it’s understandable that Americans want someone to blame.

They just might be leveling that blame at the wrong people.

What’s being overlooked is that if there were no such thing as a federal bank bailout, AIG would have still gotten an $85 billion cash infusion courtesy of U.S. taxpayers, because the company got its money from the Federal Reserve, not the Treasury Department.

In fact, the Republican-appointed Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke had already bought an 80 percent stake in AIG by the time Congress passed the federal bailout (PL 110-343) in October.

“People need to understand that the AIG guys would have still gotten their money regardless as to what Congress did or didn’t do because they never went to Congress in the first place. AIG went straight to Bernanke,” says Kathryn C. Lavelle, a political economy professor at Case Western University and fellow at the Woodrow Wilson Center in Washington, DC

The Fed, as it is commonly called, is responsible for protecting the country’s money supply. It prints money, sets interest rates and ensures there is enough cash and credit in the market. And unlike the treasury, the Fed doesn’t have to ask Congress for money or get members’ permission or guidance on how to use money under its control; much like it did when it bought $85 billion worth of AIG stock last September.

It’s another one of those quasi-government agencies like Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, but with technocrats who have a higher level of expertise.

Congress created the Federal Reserve in 1913 as a neutral entity so that it wouldn’t be subject to political pressure. At the time, the banks and government each wanted to control it; nobody wanted a politician in control of the country’s cash supply. The Fed’s current quasi-governmental structure was decided on as a compromise.

Members of Congress don’t typically involve themselves in the day-to-day dealings with the Fed, but it is a creature of Congress. In fact, Congress has the power to get rid of the Fed. That said, most members of Congress don’t even know who to call at the Fed or what kinds of questions to ask when problems like AIG arise.

Who’s to blame?

The outrage surrounding AIG reminds me of a funny scene from the 1974 Mel Brooks movie Blazing Saddles.

A new sheriff arrives and the town of Rockbridge is ecstatic until they see who he is. The men-folk pull guns on the man sworn to serve and protect them. Then the sheriff pulls his own gun and puts it to his head. “Hold it, the next man that makes a move, the (black man) gets it,” said the sheriff, threatening to kill himself, while also refusing help from the townspeople who had now become his rescuers.

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

Starting Over: How Iyanla Vanzant Lost Her Home and Health Insurance

Remember Iyanla Vanzant, the motivational speaker and prolific writer who gave us such titles as One Day My Soul Just Opened Up and Acts of Faith?

For those who still don't know who she is, Iyanla is the black version of Dr. Phil with a side of Oprah Winfrey and Maya Angelou all rolled into one person.

Well, like millions of other Americans, Iyanla got one of those exotic loans - yes, even those with money got suckered - and lost her house. On top of that, due to catastrophic illness and tragedy in her family, she also lost almost everything else. Her daughter was diagnosed with an aggressive form of cancer, and like many black folks (includng myself), Iyanla had to take on the added responsibility of taking care of her daughter, her daughter's bills and a grandchild. She also went through a divorce, and her daughter died.

We've heard a lot about the pervasive greed serially committed by those n charge of companies like AIG. And we've been bombarded with people like Rick Santelli. If you recall, he's the nice fellow who went on a televised rant a couple of weeks ago and castigated many of those who have recently lost their jobs, healthcare, homes or all three.

For those who subscribe to Santelli's point-of-view, I suggest you read Iyanla's story. For those who don't feel like Santelli, I still encourage you to read what happened with this woman and how she went from "Oprah favorite" to starting over.

Saturday, March 14, 2009

Voting Rights in Peril

Some contend that the 1965 Voting Rights Act has outlived its usefulness, and hold up President Obama as proof-positive that times have changed.

But have they changed enough?

In April, the Supreme Court is slated to decide whether part of the Voting Rights Act is unconstitutional. It is conceivable that the high court could strike down Section 5 of the law, which requires states and other jurisdictions with a history of voting discrimination to pre-clear any changes in voting rules with the U.S. Justice Department to ensure the changes cannot hurt minorities.

“Those of us who have been involved in the voting rights struggle have always viewed the Voting Rights Act as a temporary transitional remedy,” said Rep. Melvin Watt , D-N.C., who helped push through the act’s reauthorization three years ago.

The U.S. Supreme Court has struggled with the issue of race for years, and the country’s changing demographics isn’t making the task any easier.

When the court debated the midterm Texas redistricting by former House Speaker Tom DeLay, justices sent out a mixed message about race, redistricting and the Voting Rights Act, the The landmark civil rights law created to overcome a legacy of poll taxes, whites-only primaries and literacy tests, especially in Southern states.

This week, in another decision the high court seems to be saying that unless the population of a district is at least 50 percent minority, then it’s not black or brown enough to be protected by the law.

The decision leaves in question the drawing of crossover, or coalition districts, where African-Americans vote with whites, Hispanics or other ethnic groups to elect their candidates of choice.

Justice Clarence Thomas , as usual, sided with the rest of the conservative wing of the court — Chief Justice John Roberts, Antonin Scalia and Samuel Alito — in arguing that unless minorities make up more than half the voting population in a district, they are not protected by the Voting Rights Act. Justice Anthony M. Kennedy , considered a swing vote on the court, joined them.

In his opinion, some think Kennedy signaled that he too believes the Voting Rights Act is still needed. “Racial discrimination and racially polarized voting are not ancient history,” Justice Kennedy wrote. But the goal of the Voting Rights Act, he continued, was to “hasten the waning of racism in American politics” rather than to “entrench racial differences.”

Fifty percent sounds like a pretty arbitrary number, until you start thinking about the other time the court linked a number with race. As I recall, that three-fifths formula didn’t work out too well.

Click to read the rest.

Thursday, March 12, 2009

Corrective Rape?

The partially clothed body of Eudy Simelane, former star of South Africa's acclaimed Banyana Banyana national female football squad, was found in a creek in a park in Kwa Thema, on the outskirts of Johannesburg. Simelane had been gang-raped and brutally beaten before being stabbed 25 times in the face, chest and legs. As well as being one of South Africa's best-known female footballers, Simelane was a voracious equality rights campaigner and one of the first women to live openly as a lesbian in Kwa Thema.

Her brutal murder took place last April, and since then a tide of violence against lesbian women in South Africa has continued to rise. Human rights campaigners say it is characterised by what they call "corrective rape" committed by men behind the guise of trying to "cure" lesbian women of their sexual orientation.

Watch a testimonialsvideo.

Read more at The Guardian.

Saturday, March 7, 2009

Newt to the Rescue... in response to Rippa's blog on Michael Steele

With the Republican Party in seeming disarray, Newt Gingrich is emerging as someone who might be able to save conservatives — and the GOP — from themselves.

But can a former Speaker of the House do what Republican Party Chairman Michael Steele may not be able to do after effectively abdicating his party leadership role to talk-radio host Rush Limbaugh?

Many party activists insist the GOP doesn’t have a leader right now. But anyone watching Gringrich might think differently.

Take, for example, his address to the annual Conservative Political Action Conference. The former Speaker of the House took the stage to the thumping beat of ”Eye of the Tiger”, then succinctly and articulately did what Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal failed to do more than a week ago.

“I came here today to take a few minutes to answer the president and answer his attorney general and to comment on the machine which currently runs the Congress,” said Gingrich, giving the defacto Republican response to President Obama’s big speech to Congress.

To the folks in that crowd, Gingrich’s words are what they hungered to hear from somebody, anybody inside the Republican Party.

Some key phrases from Gingrich’s speech showed up as talking points on television shows — hammering on the term socialist, for instance, and charging hard against the earmarks in the catch-all spending bill.

“To suggest to us that he is opposed to earmarks when the very next day the Democrats brought up a bill with 8,000 earmarks in it, then to suggest that (this bill) doesn’t count because all the pork was in it before he got here,” he said, pausing for dramatic effect, “I was looking for change we can believe in.”

Bull’s-eye.

Like Bill Clinton, Gingrich used the rhetoric of the opposing party to discount its message.

Pulling another chapter from Clinton’s playbook, Gingrich talked about how the party should expand its base by reaching out to conservative Democrats and independents. And most importantly, he offered a plan.

Click to read the rest. Feel free to leave your thoughts here, there, or both places.

Monday, March 2, 2009

QOTD: What do you think about Obama's Iraq plan?

As many of you may already know, President Obama announced over the weekend that he will withdraw American troops by August 2010.

While he is largely keeping his campaign promise to get out of Iraq, Obama says he will leave behind 50,000 troops to advise and train Iraqi security forces and to protect U.S. interests.

Now, while Republicans like John McCain applaud this plan, Democrats like Nancy Pelosi are ticked. Some liberals see this as Obama trying to have it both ways and are angry.

Question: Do you think leaving behind 50,000 troops in Iraq is the responsible thing to do, or do you see it as Obama back-paddling on his promise?